🔗 Share this article

Champions of a independent schools established to instruct Native Hawaiians describe a new lawsuit attacking the acceptance policies as a blatant bid to ignore the wishes of a Hawaiian princess who left her estate to guarantee a better tomorrow for her community almost 140 years ago.

The Heritage of the Hawaiian Princess

These educational institutions were founded through the testament of the royal descendant, the great-granddaughter of Kamehameha I and the final heir in the Kamehameha line. At the time of her death in 1884, the her property included about 9% of the archipelago's entire territory.

Her will set up the Kamehameha schools using those holdings to finance them. Today, the system includes three locations for K-12 education and 30 kindergarten programs that prioritize Hawaiian culture-based education. The centers educate around 5,400 students across all grades and maintain an endowment of about $15 bn, a sum exceeding all but about 10 of the United States' top higher education institutions. The institutions take no money from the federal government.

Competitive Admissions and Monetary Aid

Entrance is extremely selective at every level, with only about a fifth of applicants securing a place at the upper school. Kamehameha schools additionally support about 92% of the expense of teaching their pupils, with almost 80% of the enrolled students also receiving various forms of monetary support according to economic situation.

Historical Context and Cultural Importance

Jon Osorio, the dean of the Hawaiʻinuiākea School of Hawaiian Knowledge at the UH, explained the Kamehameha schools were established at a era when the indigenous community was still on the downward trend. In the 1880s, roughly 50,000 indigenous people were believed to reside on the Hawaiian chain, decreased from a high of between 300,000 to 500,000 inhabitants at the time of contact with Europeans.

The kingdom itself was really in a uncertain situation, specifically because the United States was growing more and more interested in establishing a enduring installation at the naval base.

The dean noted across the twentieth century, “the majority of indigenous culture was being marginalized or even eradicated, or very actively suppressed”.

“At that time, the learning centers was really the sole institution that we had,” the expert, a graduate of the institutions, said. “The institution that we had, that was just for us, and had the potential at the very least of ensuring we kept pace with the general public.”

The Lawsuit

Currently, the vast majority of those registered at the centers have Native Hawaiian ancestry. But the recent lawsuit, filed in district court in Honolulu, argues that is unfair.

The legal action was initiated by a association called SFFA, a neoconservative non-profit located in Virginia that has for a long time waged a judicial war against affirmative action and ethnicity-focused enrollment. The group challenged the prestigious college in 2014 and finally obtained a historic high court decision in 2023 that led to the right-leaning majority eliminate ethnicity-based enrollment in post-secondary institutions throughout the country.

A digital portal created recently as a forerunner to the court case notes that while it is a “excellent educational network”, the schools’ “enrollment criteria expressly prefers learners with Hawaiian descent instead of applicants of other backgrounds”.

“Actually, that favoritism is so extreme that it is virtually unfeasible for a non-Native Hawaiian student to be admitted to the institutions,” Students for Fair Admission claims. “Our position is that emphasis on heritage, as opposed to academic achievement or financial circumstances, is unjust and illegal, and we are dedicated to ending Kamehameha’s improper acceptance criteria via judicial process.”

Conservative Activism

The effort is headed by Edward Blum, who has led organizations that have filed numerous court cases challenging the application of ancestry in learning, commerce and throughout societal institutions.

The strategist declined to comment to media requests. He informed a different publication that while the group backed the educational purpose, their offerings should be accessible to the entire community, “not exclusively those with a specific genetic background”.

Academic Consequences

Eujin Park, a faculty member at the education department at Stanford, explained the lawsuit aimed at the learning centers was a notable case of how the battle to roll back civil rights-era legislation and regulations to foster fair access in schools had moved from the field of colleges and universities to elementary and high schools.

The expert said activist entities had focused on Harvard “with clear intent” a in the past.

I think the challenge aims at the learning centers because they are a particularly distinct establishment… similar to the manner they chose the university very specifically.

The academic explained while preferential treatment had its detractors as a fairly limited mechanism to broaden learning access and admission, “it was an essential tool in the arsenal”.

“It was an element in this more extensive set of guidelines accessible to educational institutions to increase admission and to create a fairer learning environment,” the professor said. “Losing that mechanism, it’s {incredibly harmful