🔗 Share this article

Tehran is willing to resume atomic negotiations with the United States on condition that it is approached with "dignity" and "respect", Iran's foreign minister has declared.

The Iranian diplomat declared exclusively dialogue was effective, and disclosed recent overtures had originated from mediators to resume talks with the Trump administration. He said Iran possessed no undeclared nuclear sites, and Tehran could not yet permit the UN nuclear inspectorate to access struck enrichment centers for safety concerns.

Walking a Complex Route

The foreign minister is walking a complex path since Iran aims to avoid be seen to be operating from a stance of weakness, and he insisted repeatedly that Iran had come out stronger in military terms and emotionally from the coordinated strike on its atomic facilities in June.

He was talking at a security conference in Tehran where he reaffirmed that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to enrich uranium on home soil that it will perpetually retain" – the main reason of the impasse in the earlier negotiations.

Earlier Talks Unexpectedly Concluded

The previous five rounds of discussions between the United States and Iran were ended suddenly and acrimonious end on 12 June when Israel, with US support, struck Iranian nuclear sites in a 12-day war that culminated with Donald Trump asserting the locations had been destroyed. Following this, European countries employed their privilege to restore global restrictions, but Iran insists they have not had a significant effect.

Ideal Resolution Offered

Iranian officials said they felt they had attained a "magic solution" to the enrichment issue in previous talks, when it was agreed an local partnership with US participation could refine atomic fuel. Each party would have been able to declare success since local refinement would have continued and the US could be certain that Iran's nuclear programme was entirely non-military.

It had not been decided in the discussions that American atomic experts could function inside Iran, but that was a natural consequence of the cooperative offer. Officials claimed three times they had achieved a deal with the US representative the US official only for the arrangement to disintegrate due to "spoilers in Washington".

Existing Situation

Tehran representatives said the cooperative arrangement was now withdrawn, but it seems highly likely the proposal could be revived in some form if discussions reopen.

Trump in recent days said he had been obtaining communications that Iran desired to resume discussions, but privately Iranian officials say they are not yet receiving coherent offers from America either directly or from key regional mediators, such as the Qatari government, Egypt, the Omani authorities and Saudi Arabia. The Iranian foreign ministry has been accused of passivity in the wake of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Iran asserts negotiations is not part of a spectacle.

Political Stance

In his address to the gathering, designed to portray the US as a hegemonic power that misuses the notion of worldwide standards, the foreign minister declared the fortnight-long engagement demonstrated the conflict could not be resolved by combat operations. He stated the strikes commenced with a Washington's ultimatum for an total Iran submission and concluded with an complete request for a halt to hostilities.

Iran is convinced the initial Israeli attacks were mounted with full US knowledge and coordination, making confidence hard to restore.

Diplomacy Remains the Ultimate Resolution

Araghchi stated: "Tehran was not the one that had deserted negotiations; it was the United States and the European states that had always tried to impose their desires during the talks. Negotiations can still be alive and continues the final resolution to settle disagreements, but its requirements, regulations and fundamentals must be adhered to."

"In case they address to the nation of Iran with the tone of respect and honor, they will get a response in the equivalent tone."

Repair and Reconstruction

In what is portrayed by Tehran representatives as the conflict of recovery and rebuilding, the foreign minister claimed he was assured Iran's military capacities "have significantly improved than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been rebuilt. We acquired multiple understandings from this engagement; we have come to know our own weaknesses and the weaknesses of the opponent."

He continued: "We managed to survive this engagement. Our enrichment knowledge, which they aimed to eliminate, continues to exist. The facilities and equipment, if destroyed, will be reconstructed; what is important is the determination of the citizens of Tehran and then the social solidarity that they aimed at, but were unable to shatter. The Iranian people have grown stronger, more integrated, and more supportive of the leadership and the country in the aftermath of this invasion."